China: Economic Crisis and Its Impact

In China's market, it's the year of the bear

In China’s market, it’s the year of the bear (CNN)

Jacek Popiel

A few weeks ago we examined the source of China’s “meteoric” rise to the rank of the second largest world economy and concluded that the “miracle” was essentially a one-off play based on offering the lowest cost for the production of goods for export. While successful, the policy destroyed both income and assets in countries where production activities were transferred abroad. For a time China got richer, but its customers grew poorer to the extent they can no longer afford to support China’s growth.

China’s attempted cure for this was a huge, credit-fueled, fixed investment program – with low or non-existent returns against a mountain of internal debt. China is now attempting to deal with economic slowdown, financial instability, a stock market crash and a potential loss of public confidence both internally and abroad. The economic news is now as focused on China’s considerable problems as it once was on its extraordinary achievements.

How will it end?

China’s structure – the capitalist, the socialist, and whatever lies in between – is too complex and opaque to permit a clear analytical answer. But a historical perspective can provide some clarity.

China has been a great power for well over two thousand years, but not continuously. Between the reigns of great imperial dynasties were periods of decay, civil war, foreign invasion and general disorder. As the imperial state became weak, corrupt, and ineffective the country fragmented into pieces controlled by local warlords or invaders or petty dynasties. Such periods, often lasting decades, entailed great loss of life, power and treasure.

Such a time could be at hand if today’s rulers are unable to deal with current issues. Their task is made harder by the fact that post-Mao China does not have a “national blueprint” to resolve its hodge-podge of Marxism, capitalism and miscellaneous special interests.

How important this issue can be is illustrated by recent history. In the 1800s both China and Japan faced similar challenges: an antiquated system of governance leading to weakness in the face of Western imperialism. In both countries there were factions proposing nearly identical solutions: openness to Western ideas and institutions, industrialization, and adoption of Western methods and technology.

Japan found the will to do so, and in the 1860s launched its successful modernization program, known as the Meiji Restoration. China’s rulers instead chose repression that kindled the Taiping Rebellion – a civil war that raged from 1851 to 1864, cost between 20 and 70 million lives, and fatally weakened the empire.

Now the wheel has come full circle: after the imperial collapse and resulting disorder, World War II, communist dictatorship and the get-rich quick episode of the last thirty years China needs a unifying national philosophy. For both rulers and people the choice is at hand.

Such a choice faced the Soviet Union in the 1980s, as the collapse of the grand Marxist-Leninist experiment became obvious. In that case the leaders, recognizing their failure to bring about the promised “workers’ paradise,” had the wisdom to relinquish power and dissolve the USSR. Though Russia is not out of the woods yet, the transition from communism was both historically quick and relatively peaceful, if uneven.

China soon will have to choose its path, and the consequences will be felt by all.

Because of the position China has so rapidly – and imprudently – taken on the global stage, its decisions will deeply affect the United States. For the U.S. the Soviet Union was a military threat, but our economies were almost entirely separate. What the Russians did with its “Soviet Republics” impacted our national security and high-level politics, but not our material well-being and daily lives.

With China it is the opposite. We are tied together through finance, trade and the supply of products used by every American citizen. An economic and/or political crisis in China would immediately generate its mirror image here, from Main Street to Wall Street and Washington. We may find out that our policies of the last thirty years – meaning our over-reliance on “Made in China” products – have been imprudent as well, and that the price to be paid for our dependency on China for cheap goods is much, much higher than we thought.

Born in Poland, Jacek Popiel was educated in Africa, Canada, and the United States. He speaks five languages. His career spans military and international business development in the Soviet Union, Eastern and Western Europe, North America, and Japan. He is currently a freelance writer and political consultant. His book “Viable Energy Now,” grew out of his military and international business experience and his professional involvement with energy issues.

3 thoughts on “China: Economic Crisis and Its Impact

  1. A very insightful analysis! I would like t see the author’s comments on how our capitalist class has used the weakening of our working class, because of the shift of industry to China, to further the reduction of wages, benefits, and labor organization.

  2. “A few weeks ago we examined the source of China’s “meteoric” rise to the rank of the second largest world economy and concluded that the “miracle” was essentially a one-off play based on offering the lowest cost for the production of goods for export. While successful, the policy destroyed both income and assets in countries where production activities were transferred abroad. For a time China got richer, but its customers grew poorer.to the extent they can no longer afford to support China’s growth.” from article above

    The author has written a very thought provoking analysis of China’s situation with valuable references to its effect on the world economies. Yet I feel that despite the accuracy of his observations on China the US will suffer more than China from the worldwide fallout he refers to. China has industrialized with advanced technology in less than 25 years dwarfing the speed of industrialization by generations in the West. The US and Europe shipped entire manufacturing processes and commercial intelligence to China and who profited? Well, China certainly did. And as the author wisely says:

    “For a time China got richer, but its customers grew poorer”. But other’s than China got richer and they are now among those richest 1% who have been able to buy our politicians and steal our democracy.
    China is ahead, despite problems, and has much of our manufacturing capability while we have skilled workers flipping hamburgers for Chinese wages. Look no further than the 1% who continue to use their new wealth to buy politicians who pass legislation giving them further tax breaks while weakening labor laws and selling off more common property and social institutions like prisons and schools to the private profit sector.

    Al lin all, China and the Chinese people will remain better off for the industrial boost the West gave them while the West and the USA have drifted into oligarchies who have used their wealth to undercut the common good and democracy is suffering all over the world.

  3. Pingback: Footing the Bill for Our Overdependence on China | The Contrary Perspective

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s